Share this
Are You Using the Right Packaging for DIM Weight Pricing?
by Staci Americas on Jul 20, 2021 10:00:00 AM
Though dimensional weight, or DIM weight, is hardly a new pricing model, it remains a hidden profit killer for pick and pack fulfillment operations that don’t properly manage it. Misunderstanding how parcel carriers determine shipping rates can inflate your shipping costs 5–15%, so it’s imperative to choose your most cost-effective packaging option.
Carriers use DIM weight to make sure they don’t lose money shipping large, lightweight packages. For example, an oversized pillow may weight very little. But shipping it in a large box would take up a lot of room on a truck. If the carrier charged only for the weight of the pillow, it couldn’t turn a profit on that particular shipment.
DIM weight uses a mathematical formula to account for the volume of large, lightweight packages. DIM weight formulas account for the package’s density, essentially determining how much a package of that particular size should weigh. The formula for DIM weight is the parcel’s volume divided by a particular divisor. The divisors vary by carrier and service.
The USPS uses a standard divisor of 166. As an example, a 10x10x10 packaging would have a volume of 1,000. 1,000 ÷ 166 = 6.02. Carriers always round up to the nearest whole number, so our example package has a dimensional weight of seven pounds.
Carriers determine what they will charge based on the higher of the parcel’s actual weight or DIM weight. To benefit from the DIM weight pricing model, you should use ideal packaging for each item you ship.
Beat DIM Weight Pricing with Better Packaging
Some eCommerce shippers will customize packaging solutions to shave every last cent out of DIM weight pricing, but that isn’t always necessary. The following packaging tips will ensure that dimensional weight carrier pricing doesn’t get the best of you.
1. Start right-sizing your shipping boxes
When your boxes are too big, you will pay more to ship that extra air. Using only one or two box sizes for products of a wide range of sizes means you’re probably overspending because of DIM weight pricing. Conversely, a healthy mix of standard box sizes will eliminate the need for unnecessary void fill materials, reducing actual weight while also lowering DIM weight through the use of correctly sized packaging.
Consider that hypothetical 10x10x10 box we shipped with USPS above, with its DIM weight of seven pounds. Shipping that box into the first shipping zone with USPS Priority Mail 1-Day would cost $12.40. Now, imagine you could trim just one inch off each dimension of the box without losing protection or effectiveness. A 9x9x9 box would have a DIM weight of five pounds at a same-zone shipping cost of $10.60. That’s a savings of $1.80 per package. Apply that 15% savings across your total parcel shipping volume and you’re talking about a significant savings.
2. Audit your freight bills
Parcel carriers employ automated scanners to determine box dimensions, and sometimes those scanners get it wrong. When you see language such as “we calculated charges based on a DIM weight of…,” verify that the automated DIM weight measurements were correct. Providing actual parcel dimensions for each shipment will help avoid inaccurate measurements or costly rounding on the carrier side.
3. Use alternative shipping packaging wherever possible
Polybags minimize package size and can be a very economical alternative to boxes for small, durable, lightweight products. Given that polybags will often weigh several ounces less than a box, they also help push down actual weight. In some scenarios, polybags have resulted in six-figure savings over shipping boxes.
Of note, some carriers exempt envelopes and bubble mailers smaller than 12 x 15 inches and less than ¾-inch thick from DIM weight pricing. As a result, this packaging may generate substantial savings compared to boxes.
4. Use a minimum amount of dunnage
Warehouse associates regularly overestimate the amount of dunnage required to protect an item in transit, which leads to oversizing of boxes and higher DIM weights and actual weights. Replacing bulkier void fill packaging — such as bubble wrap, Kraft paper, or packaging peanuts — with air pillows can reduce space requirements and actual weight for your parcels.
5. Consider the use of hybrid parcel services
The major private parcel carriers offer hybrid services in conjunction with USPS, where USPS handles last-mile delivery of the parcel. Leveraging this capability through services like FedEx SmartPost or UPS SurePost may soften the overall impact of DIM weight costs since USPS often uses a higher divisor that results in lower overall DIM weight rates.
Attending to the above DIM weight details can cut your annual parcel shipping costs 5–15%. For more advice on reducing your parcel spend, check out Staci Americas' eBook, 10 Ways to Reduce Parcel Shipping Costs.
Share this
- Fulfillment Operations (72)
- Fulfillment Services (39)
- Parcel Shipping for eCommerce (16)
- Amware Fulfillment News (7)
- Top Fulfillment Locations (7)
- Fulfillment Automation (6)
- Warehouse KPI (6)
- Multi Channel Fulfillment (5)
- Direct Sales Fulfillment (3)
- Fulfillment Outsourcing (2)
- Marketing/Sales Literature Fulfillment (2)
- Outsourcing Fulfillment (2)
- Alternatives to Amazon FBA (1)
- Fulfillment News (1)
- Fulfillment for Direct Response (1)
- Innovation (1)
- International Fulfillment (1)
- eCommerce Parcel Shipping (1)
- April 2025 (4)
- March 2025 (4)
- February 2025 (4)
- January 2025 (4)
- December 2024 (4)
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (2)
- September 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (4)
- October 2023 (5)
- September 2023 (6)
- August 2023 (6)
- July 2023 (5)
- June 2023 (10)
- May 2023 (6)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (11)
- February 2023 (9)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (3)
- November 2022 (1)
- October 2022 (3)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (3)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (3)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (1)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (1)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (1)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (3)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- January 1970 (2)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think